Review - Bhool Bhulaiyaa
15th October 2007 | posted in Anand S, Guest, Hindi Movies, Reviews |Alternate Names: Bhool Bhulaiya
| Rating: | Watch if you have nothing better to do |
Rationality battles mumbo jumbo and gives rise to hodgepodge!
Having served as an Assistant Director for the original Malayalam film, Manichithrathazu (The Ornate Lock), starring Mohanlal, Shobhana, and Suresh Gopi, Priyadarshan has taken it upon himself to remake the film in Hindi as Bhool Bhulaiya. The film has also been remade in Kannada and Telugu, and more famously in Tamil, with Rajnikant in the lead.
Having unleashed a spate of shallow, loud, and situational gag oriented comedies, all of which were remakes of various Malayalam films, Bhool Bhulaiya requires Priyadarshan to tackle something that he had no need to engage with so far; namely a script that revolves around the psychological perturbation of one of the characters. This perturbation causes certain effects, all of which we see in sequence as the film unspools. The cause is revealed towards the end, and justifies the climax of the film. All the major characters in the film are part of the “Great Indian family”; so we have the karta and his sister, their respective spouses and children, and the nephew who has just returned from America with his new bride. The only non ‘family’ character who is significant is the psychiatrist, played by Akshay Kumar.
The director is unable to decide whether he would like the film to be a comedy or sound a more serious note; the first half sees him trying to squeeze laughter from the audience by forcing the ‘senior family’ members to act like half wits, while the second half suddenly becomes somber and doom laden. This necessitates a sudden change in the character of the psychiatrist, who until then is only too happy to ham it up loudly with the other members of the family.
Unfortunately this sudden shift in mood leaves the viewer laughing at or at the very least contemplating this ‘serious’ part of the film, which includes the climax, with mild amusement. The director is unable to create and sustain an ambience and a tempo that involves the viewer and has him or her empathizing with the collective ordeals of the family members, as well as that of the lead protagonist.
From a slightly more abstract perspective, the film can be seen as a clash between western rationality and religious superstitition (as embodied in myths and a belief in the occult) and represented in the film as a clash between two generations: one steeped in rituals and esoteric practices and living in a ‘Hindu small town’, and the other, embodied through modern and western educated characters who hold ‘professional’ occupations. This theme is further exemplified in the film through the character of the psychiatrist and his ‘modern’ psychology versus the mumbo jumbo of the religious priests.
Towards the end of the film a change is shown happening to one of the characters. This change could possibly be interpreted as an omnivorous female sexuality reasserting itself in the face of insipid patriarchal matrimony!!!! This sexuality is subversive and threatening to the existing patriarchal order and hence the psychiatrist (male, of course) helps restore order and put things in their proper place.
The cast has little to do in the film as they are playing out stereotypes; a fine actor like Shiney Ahuja is reduced to either bland acceptance or frothing rage, Amisha Patel weeps and moans throughout in a shrill voice, Vidya Balan is all sunshine and cheer, while Asrani, Paresh Rawal, and Manoj Joshi alternately rant and rave or are busy trying to look scared. Akshay Kumar does his best, but the sudden shift in the script from the comic to the darkly tragic, pulls the stuffing out of his performance. Vineeth has been chosen for a non-consequential role, only for his terpsichorean prowess. Rajpal Yadav is a total waste, not his fault, as his screen time runs to about five minutes or so.
Sabu Cyril’s art direction is adequate, though he overdoes his bit in the crowd scenes and peoples the frame with too many holy men. The songs are a distraction and come in the way of the script seeking to build and maintain psychological tension.
The climax is worthwhile, but unfortunately the emphasis on comedy in the earlier part of the film, completely ruins it. The director could have reined himself in and set a bleak and ominous approach which would have made the film taut but does not do so, possibly because of the ‘comic’ expectations that the audience has of him. One wonders whether one would ever get to see realistic cinema in mainstream Bollywood; even when the themes are realistic, the execution reduces them to crude buffoonery or a stylized gore fest. One waits for the day.
Click here to read what I scribbled on my notepad while watching this movie (what worked and what didn’t for me). Might contain spoilers!
Click here to see what 24 other reviewers/viewers think. Average rating 3.0 / 5.0: 13 thumbs up, 3 so-so, 8 thumbs down.
If you enjoyed reading this, please help maintain this site with a donation
| Rating: | Watch if you have nothing better to do |
Detailed Ratings (out of 5):
posted on October 15th, 2007 at 9:51 pm
posted on October 18th, 2007 at 4:34 am
posted on October 18th, 2007 at 8:03 am
posted on October 18th, 2007 at 10:18 pm
posted on October 19th, 2007 at 6:03 am
posted on October 25th, 2007 at 3:07 pm
posted on October 29th, 2007 at 2:58 am
posted on November 6th, 2007 at 8:23 am
posted on November 9th, 2007 at 10:52 am
posted on November 14th, 2007 at 12:41 pm
posted on December 6th, 2007 at 11:13 am
posted on December 8th, 2007 at 12:52 pm
posted on December 17th, 2007 at 3:35 am
posted on December 30th, 2007 at 4:37 pm
posted on January 20th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
posted on January 29th, 2008 at 11:21 am
posted on March 9th, 2008 at 10:44 am
posted on April 2nd, 2008 at 11:43 am
posted on September 28th, 2009 at 8:38 am